[Philosophical Puzzle] - Newcomb's Paradox

Posted by Kyo on February 29, 2008 at 15:29:23:

A person is playing a game operated by the Predictor, an entity somehow presented as being exceptionally skilled at predicting people's actions. The exact nature of the Predictor varies between retellings of the paradox. Some assume that the character always has a reputation for being completely infallible and incapable of error. The Predictor can be presented as a psychic, as a superintelligent alien, as a deity, etc.

The player of the game is presented with two opaque boxes, labeled A and B. The player is permitted to take the contents of both boxes, or just of box B. (The option of taking only box A is ignored, for reasons soon to be obvious.) Box A contains $1,000. The contents of box B, however, are determined as follows: At some point before the start of the game, the Predictor makes a prediction as to whether the player of the game will take just box B, or both boxes. If the Predictor predicts that both boxes will be taken, then box B will contain nothing. If the Predictor predicts that only box B will be taken, then box B will contain $1,000,000.

By the time the game begins, and the player is called upon to choose which boxes to take, the prediction has already been made, and the contents of box B have already been determined. That is, box B contains either $0 or $1,000,000 before the game begins, and once the game begins even the Predictor is powerless to change the contents of the boxes. Before the game begins, the player is aware of all the rules of the game, including the two possible contents of box B, the fact that its contents are based on the Predictor's prediction, and knowledge of the Predictor's infallibility. The only information withheld from the player is what prediction the Predictor made, and thus what the contents of box B are.

Which choice (both boxes, or box B only) should the player make?

For the (paradoxically non-existent) Solution, which has intriguingly more to do with Philosophy than Mathematics/Logic per se, click here :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newcomb's_paradox

Follow Ups:

• [Philosophical Puzzle] - Kavka's toxin puzzle - Kyo 02/29/08 (1)
  • [Philosophical Puzzle] - Prisoner's Dilemma - Kyo 02/29/08 (0)

Post a Followup

Name    : 
E-Mail  : 
Password: 
Subject : 

Comments:

Optional Link URL : 
Link Title        : 
Optional Image URL: